How Law Hired researches, reviews, labels, updates, and corrects public content
Legal and legal-technology content requires visible accountability. Every substantive resource should tell readers who prepared it, what was reviewed, which sources support it, when it was updated, and how to report an error.
How it works
Authorship and expertise
Name the responsible author. Identify an attorney reviewer only when a real attorney reviewed the specific content; never imply blanket legal approval.
Sources and dates
Prefer statutes, courts, agencies, standards bodies, vendor documentation, and original evidence. Display publication, review, and material-update dates.
Human review
A responsible human reviews substantive public content for factual support, useful analysis, legal-advice boundaries, and publication quality.
Corrections and conflicts
Provide a correction channel, date material changes, preserve meaningful correction notes, and disclose commercial relationships or sponsorship.
What you can hold us to
No invented author or reviewer
No citation laundering through secondary summaries
No hidden sponsored conclusion
No silent material correction
Questions firms ask
Does every page require attorney review?
No. Product and company pages require knowledgeable internal review. Substantive legal explanations should receive appropriately scoped attorney review before publication.
How are errors reported?
Use the contact page with the URL, disputed statement, and supporting source. Do not send confidential matter information.
Can AI publish content automatically?
No. Material public content requires accountable human review.